I wish I could tell you exactly where I think the Motorola Razr went wrong, but there are too many options to choose from. Its the first of a new generation of folding devices that open vertically into a regular phone shape instead of horizontally into a mini-tablet like Samsungs Galaxy Fold. That means Motorola had the benefit of learning from earlier missteps from the Fold and a very few other devices, but it still makes too many mistakes of its own.
The Motorola Razr is a Verizon-exclusive phone that retails for $1,499, but it has features and functionality that would barely pass as acceptable on a $250 phone. Motorola, in fact, just announced a far superior $250 phone, the Moto G Power. Of course, the Moto G doesnt fold in half.
If the Razr didnt fold and cost a penny over $250, Id tell you to skip it, which means theres really only one question to ask: how much is that folding screen worth to you?
Every smartphone is a bundle of trade-offs. Even if price is no object and you want to buy the biggest, best phone on the market, youre still making the most obvious trade-off of all: spending a lot of money.
That is the Razrs first major trade-off. Im harping on the $1,500 price, but not because its too high for any phone. Phones are our primary computers, and many people could reasonably justify that price or something even higher for the right phone. The problem with the Razr is that it delivers so few of the things youd expect at that or any price.
But you likely arent coming to the Razr because you care a lot about traditional ways to judge phones. The camera may be mediocre and the battery life sub-par, but it flips, damnit, and it looks like those classic Razr phones, just a little bigger.
There are also some real benefits in having a small phone that unfolds into a big one: it will fit into any pocket without poking out, for one thing. Theres also a vague sort of feeling that having a phone you can close may make it less tempting to use all the time than a regular slab. That didnt really happen to me. Unlike my experience with the Galaxy Fold, the Razr didnt make me feel like my relationship to the phone changed. But a folding flip phone is still pretty cool, and we shouldnt act like there isnt value in that.
Which is to say that the Razr does have some good things going for it. The overall look and feel of the device when closed is unique and does an excellent job of evoking the original. Even if you dont have any fond memories of flip phones, you can still appreciate that its something different from the usual featureless rectangles most phones have become. There is a retro aesthetic that is genuinely appealing both in a nostalgic way and on its own merits. Plus, when closed, its actually thinner than the original Razr V3 from 2004.
When you open it, there is a big old chin on the bottom that presumably allows the rest of the phone to be thinner. I also think it helps with balance. This is a very tall phone: the screen is 6.2 inches, but its at a 21.9:9 aspect ratio. It feels too narrow for me to comfortably type on, but I think thats something you could get used to over time. The overall build quality is solid. Sure, theres some plastic on the back and some fairly big bezels around the screen, but in some ways, thats part of the charm.
What youre really here for is the hinge and the folding screen. Unfortunately, this is where we have to start talking about trade-offs again serious ones.
The Razrs screen is made of plastic, and it was recently one-upped by Samsungs Galaxy Z Flip, which has the first folding glass display ever. Tough break. In general, though, folding screens are so new that its hard to know exactly what standard to judge them by. Clearly, they require trade-offs, but which trade-offs are reasonable and which are dumb wont be clear until we use more of them.
What I dont like: the soft plastic is likely to pick up nicks, dings, and indentations from use and I think fairly normal use, at that. It feels slightly more robust than the Galaxy Folds screen, but that may just be because its smaller. Motorolas main innovation with the screen is how it constructed the hinge to minimize any creasing and allow the phone to close completely flat. There are two parts to this story.
First, the screen forms a kind of teardrop inside the hinge as it closes, bulging out into some interior space Motorola left for just that purpose. Its very clever, and it does minimize the appearance of a crease on the phone when its opened up. You can see it if you look, but its much less prominent than you might expect.
The plastic screen looks fine but doesnt feel good under your thumb
Heres the trade-off: when the phone is open, it feels bad under your fingers. If you move your finger over the center of the screen with any kind of natural pressure, you can feel weird dips and bumps underneath the screen. And, well, think about how often you slide your finger over the middle of the screen as you scroll. Motorola actually put out a video that says bumps and lumps are normal.
Motorola also made the screen float a bit so that, as the phone closes, the bottom part of it can slide into the chin just a little. I imagine this is necessary so the screen doesnt bunch up as it forms that teardrop shape. In that regard, it is another clever solution.
Heres the trade-off for that, though: tapping on the bottom of the screen feels genuinely awful when the phone is fully open. It just feels loose. You can feel the screen move and hit whatever is behind it every time you tap the back button.
As for overall screen quality, Im ambivalent. It doesnt seem as vibrant or as bright as what you can get on a regular slab phone, but it also seems perfectly fine for most uses. Watching video is awkward because you get gigantic black bars when you go full screen. Here again, though, I have to admit that I dont know what should count as good enough for a folding screen. Judged by the standards of a Galaxy S10 or iPhone 11 Pro, it looks washed-out and dim. Judged against the Galaxy Fold, it seems average.
Since weve talked about the hinge so much, we need to get to another trade-off. Maybe youve heard about it, or maybe youve literally heard it. The creak.
Folding phones need to minimize and control the forces that hit their screens: bending is fine, flexing and twisting are not so fine. So they have finely tuned hinges with complicated systems of interlocking gears that need to do that work. Hopefully, the hinge mechanism is also constructed so that it can be kept free of debris.
Whatever Motorola did to the Razrs hinge seems to have achieved all of those goals, but it comes with a side effect: a creaking noise when you open and close it. Youll hear it in the video above, and it got steadily worse over the first few days of use before settling into a consistent state of grating and awful. In a quiet room, its genuinely embarrassing. Any hope you might have of impressing your friends and making your enemies jealous of your flipping phone will immediately evaporate if you show it to them in a quiet environment.
Heres Motorolas statement on the noise:
When folding and unfolding razr, you may hear a sound, which is intrinsic to the mechanical movement of the phone. razr has undergone rigorous durability testing, and the reported sounds in no way affect the quality of the product.
Id say the sound does affect the quality of the product. If you close your ears and use it, you could find it acceptable. It doesnt let you set the hinge at any angle, and it doesnt snap closed on its own like a classic Razr, but it works. I can open the phone with one hand, and the hinge is just loose enough to let you flick it out with a classic flip phone flourish.
But it doesnt spark that ineffable sense of satisfaction and rightness that well-crafted physical objects can. I love the way a makeup compact snicks shut or how a luxury car door closes with a kind of airlock seal or yes how a classic Razr flips open.
Plus, since the fingerprint sensor is on the bottom, I find theres yet another step I have to take to unlock the phone. Because of that, I ended up using two hands to unfold the Razr most of the time, doing my best to not listen to the sound it made when I did.
The camera is perfectly acceptable for a phone that costs around $500 in the year 2018. Unfortunately for Motorola, the Razr costs $1,500 and it is 2020 a year in which you can buy a Pixel 3A for $399 (or less on discount) with a camera that absolutely smokes the Razr.
Its a 16-megapixel sensor, and I was able to get decent shots in bright light or simple conditions. But Ive been able to say that about most smartphone cameras for years now. Introduce even a little complication, like movement, shadow, or low light, and the whole thing falls apart. I had a super hard time even getting it to properly focus on faces. There is a night mode but it doesnt do much.
One bright spot is that Motorolas extra features are focused on fun little effects that are appropriate for this camera instead of promising perfect bokeh on portrait shots. Theres a color pop mode and a cinemagraph mode that are both kind of neat. In most cases, the effects Motorola lays on are so extremely artificial-looking that it actually works. Its like a retro aesthetic that I find almost endearing.
So, for example, the photo in the set above is not good by any objective standard. But I think it looks cool.
Were in the home stretch here, and its time to talk about software, one place where Motorola usually wins by showing restraint. Thats definitely the case here. I am super annoyed that this is running Android 9 instead of Android 10, but I do like Motorolas subtle software enhancements. The twist and chop gestures for turning on the flashlight or camera are genuinely useful, for example.
But the main software intervention Motorola has made is to enable the outer screen, the Peek Display. Think of it like a big, simple smartwatch on the front of your phone. It can show you the time, and you can use it as a selfie viewfinder.
It also shows you notifications, but it does so by laying little icons out in a horizontally scrolling space at the bottom. To view them, you have to learn a custom language of taps and swipes and holds that I found unintuitive. Some do support quick reply or let you reply with voice, but generally, its easier just to open the phone.
The outer display is big and pretty but underutilized
Since this is a Verizon exclusive, there is Verizon junkware. A ton of it: 12 apps by my count, some of which are unnecessary Verizon subscription services that are redundant next to the free services you get built in to Android. Its gross and annoying, especially considering how much this thing costs.
The specs are not especially good on the phone, but Im not annoyed by too many of them. Motorola chose a midrange Snapdragon 710 processor so it could maximize battery life and thinness. For most day-to-day tasks, its perfectly sufficient, and it never bothered me.
Battery life, unfortunately, is barely sufficient. I could eke out a day only by forcing myself to use the phone a little less or a little differently than I usually do. Most days, I was topping off in the late afternoon to be safe. The 2,510mAh battery is simply too small. And while that means the Razr can be thin and have a second screen, the trade-off isnt worth it. Theres no wireless charging either, but it does support fast charging via standard USB-C Power Delivery.
I dont think a $1,500 folding phone needs to have top-flight specs. Youre paying for that fold and the novelty of it. It brings us back to that original question: how much is that novelty worth? I do think its worth something, utility aside. For me, its not so much novelty as nostalgia, though, and I get that people who have only experienced candy bar phones may not feel any emotional connection to the flip.
But the Razr fails to meet even a basic level of competence when it comes to the camera and battery life. Again, if this phone didnt fold, I wouldnt recommend it at one-sixth of its current price.
Thats not even the most damning part of it. I could envision rationalizing all of those trade-offs away in exchange for a flip phone, maybe, but the experience of actually flipping it open and shutting it is bad. If ever there was a you had one job situation with a new phone, this was it.
Ive been talking a lot about trade-offs in this review. But theres another word for trade-off compromise and thats what the Razr is: a compromised phone.
Sign up for the
A newsletter about computers
Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These do not influence editorial content, though Vox Media may earn commissions for products purchased via affiliate links. For more information, see our ethics policy. Prices displayed are based on the MSRP at time of posting.