After his team was eliminated from the NHL playoffs, someone asked Chicago general manager Stan Bowman what it was like inside the bubble.
Almost like youre in prison, Bowman said. Its the mental toll that youre kind of trapped. You cant go anywhere. And over time, it does start to get to you.
Chicago was knocked out in the first round, meaning Bowmans team spent three weeks in fully catered confinement. Stanley Cup finalists Dallas and Tampa have been in there for eight weeks and counting.
Story continues below advertisement
So how does eight months sound?
If the next NHL season continues under current COVID-19 parameters, its going to seem less like a hockey campaign and more like a sociological experiment into deep-space exploration. But in this version, the astronauts and everyone at mission control take a huge pay cut before liftoff.
So maybe the question shouldnt be when the 2020-21 NHL season starts, but if a 2020-21 season makes any sense.
On Saturday, commissioner Gary Bettman did his usual prefinal news conference. Traditionally, this is Bettmans chance to pat hockey on the head and tell it its a very good boy.
There was more of that than usual this time around. Youd think the NHL had taken Omaha Beach, rather than convinced its employees to follow basic medical protocols.
But all the self-congratulatory vibes took a swing when Bettman was asked about next year.
Back in July, the NHL speculatively floated the idea to its players’ union of a Dec. 1 start to the 2020-21 campaign.
Story continues below advertisement
On Saturday, Bettman bristling noticeably and switching into his second language, Deep Jargon walked that back.
Obviously, weve started informally thinking about what optionality is (listener begins flipping through dictionary) Dec. 1 has always been a notional date. I will not be surprised if it slips into later December. It could slip into January.
Do I hear February? Will anyone give me February? How about March? Whos willing to go to March?
In trying to plot its near future, the NHL has a bunch of problems, which boil down to one problem how much are people willing to give up in order to continue playing hockey?
How much freedom? How much money? How much joie de vivre? And, because its the only one that matters, how much money?
If the season restarts in December or January, per Bettmans hope, then its a bubble season. Other leagues can huddle in (the increasingly breached) Fortress America. The NHL has a closed border to deal with.
Story continues below advertisement
Having denied the Toronto Blue Jays the right to hop back and forth across the border, there is no way Ottawa can explain seven hockey teams doing the same thing under virtually the same circumstances. Basing the Montreal Canadiens in Dubuque is a non-starter. So a bubble it is.
A bubble season is a fanless season. A fanless season is a financial disaster.
Its no secret that attendance, directly and indirectly, impacts at least 50 per cent of our revenues, Bettman said.
A dozen NHL teams already operate either in the red or close to it. The owners talk a good game about being in it together. Were about to see how well that utopian ideal works under rational market conditions.
In order to make the season viable, the pain will have to be passed on to the players, and in several ways.
First, theres the bubble itself. Whats the best way to do a stretch in solitary? Do you do it in one big push, or do you lengthen it to accommodate breaks out in the yard?
Story continues below advertisement
Then theres the money. The players had already been paid out the bulk of their salaries for this season when the bubble began. Now were into a different reality. There is no way the owners will agree to a restart unless the players’ union agrees to enormous, across-the-board pay cuts. That would require reopening the collective agreement, which had just been extended to 2026.
Take all the spirit of the game talk out of it. If your billionaire employer came to you and asked you to take a 50-per-cent whack and assuming you didnt need that money in order to afford groceries would you go for it? Of course you wouldnt.
That would suit the owners fine. Holding a full NHL season without fans in attendance makes no business sense at all. Cultural inertia might convince the legacy franchises to continue good of the nation, public spiritedness and all that. But nobody in Columbus or Nashville thinks hockey is integral to civic morale.
The NBA the closest analogous business can probably manage a full year without fans because of the size of its TV contracts. But the NHL cannot. A pandemic season will bleed some clubs dry.
The most obvious solution one no one in the NHL has said out loud yet is putting things on hold for a year.
This would spare us the predictable goonshow of the union and ownership spending the next four or five months trying to blame each other for a cancelled season neither wants to happen.
Story continues below advertisement
If and when the pandemic begins to ease again, thats likely to happen next spring. There is no sense in starting a hockey season in April or May. That would functionally mean the NHL is declaring hockey a summer sport.
Logistically, calling a pause isnt difficult. Put all current contracts in stasis. Hold the draft. Sign free agents, but dont start their clock until the league resumes. Broadcasters wont be happy, but its better than paying to televise hockey in August that far fewer people want to watch.
Everyone loses a year, but no one loses their shirt.
Fans will find other things to do for a while. Theyve already managed that several times in the past 20 years, and the NHL is no worse off for it. In fact, it may have done better out of the bargain.
Is this the way anyone wants it? Probably not. Is that where were going to end up anyway? The current reality suggests it is.
The big question now is how long the NHL, its owners and its players want to draw this out before they realize this finals, the hockey going on right now, could be their last hurrah for a while.